I began digital with a K110D which had quite a noisy sensor & later
found the K7 much the same. Mind you, they both did quite well at low
ISO. My K5 is a vast improvement.
Alan C
On 20-Jan-20 09:37 PM, Ralf R Radermacher wrote:
Am 20.01.20 um 19:36 schrieb Paul Stenquist:
Regardless of how much ink the K20D received the K10D was a better
camera.
It most definitely was. The K20D was, as we say in German, the
difference between well done and well meant. So was the K-7. Lost years.
Boy, was I glad when this Samsung episode was over at last and I got my
K-5. Even if it had to be exchanged several times before I got one
without the sensor problem.
I can still identify my photos taken with the K20D and the K-7 just by
their noise.
Ralf
--
Ralf R. Radermacher - Köln/Cologne, Germany
Blog : http://the-real-fotoralf.blogspot.com
Audio : http://aporee.org/maps/projects/fotoralf
Web : http://www.fotoralf.de
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
