----- Original Message -----
From: Bill Owens
Subject: Re: Carry-on inspection of film -- and an unfortunate
incident


> > My photo lab has a sign up warning customers that they've
experienced
> > problems with APS film being fogged by X-ray security
machines, but not
> > other film types. I'll ask them for more info next time I'm
there.
> >
> > Could it have something to do with the magnetic layer on APS
films?
>
> Not likely.  Could it be because APS uses a plastic cassette
instead of
> metal, like 35mm?  If so, 120 film should also be fogged>

This is the likely culprit. The steel film can is pretty X-Ray
opaque, with damage coming in via the felt lips and the plastic
spool. APS canisters are X-Ray transparent. They are barely
visible light tight at best anyway.
I would be very hesitant to trust the word of a security goon
about the potential damage from any radiation exuding inspection
device. They are not trained professionals, they are merely
parroting the baboonery from their bureaucrat bosses, who
generally take the best case scenario from the manufacturer of
the equipment and call it the worst case scenario.

Unfortunately with the present level of paranoia, the traveling
photographer is best advised to buy his film and processing at
the destination, whenever possible, no matter how it impacts the
economies of the photographer and his home processing lab.

There has never been a guarantee that inspection equipment will
not damage film, the damage is cumulative, and is most likely to
happen to film that has already been exposed.

William Robb
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .

Reply via email to