On Sun, 18 Aug 2002, andre wrote: > >I'm a big fan of the 24/35/50/85/105 progression, but everyone has their > >own preferences. > >chris > > Chris, isn't the "classical" progression 24/35/50/85/135/200/300?
Well, that's debatable. 28mm lenses usually figure into the list somehow. In any case, that was just my own preference, not a guide to the classical progression. :) I find 135mm pretty much useless for the type of photography I do, personally, as I'm usually too close to use it for portraits. I also don't use anything longer than 85mm very much, so I just pop on my FA 80-320 zoom if I need to. chris - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
