Jerry wrote: > In a message dated 8/20/2002 3:38:57 PM Central Daylight Time, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > > ..but the Z-1p's body is pretty cheaply made and it has nowhere near the > > rigidity of the MZ-S or its durability regarding the outer body. > > > > I hate to continue to be the devils advocate here, but how are you MEASURING > rigidity
The rigidity of the MZ-S was stated by Pentax engineers. It also quite obvious from hanling one. It feels like it's carved out of a single block of granite. >and has the MZ-S been oj the market long enough to determine > durability...again how are you measuring durability? Or is this just more > touchy feely stuff? I did say durability of the outer body. The Z-1p is soft, scratch-prone plastic. The MZ-S has the most durable, wear resistant outer body finish of any Pentax ever. It won't suffer cracked bottom plates either. I didn't comment of the durability of the inner parts. The Z-1p was good in this regard. Pål - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
