Artur,

Get a grip!  Now that you have told us over and over that the fact
that Pentax is NOT going to directly compete with Nikon/Canon and
build the Robocamera that you desire (High FPS and 1/8000 shutter) and
the only camera that Pentax has ever produced that is worth anything
(Z-1p even though it was a financial flop), why don't you go and get
that F100.  If not, you are going to be sorely disappointed.  You
can't accept the MZ-S for what it is - even though almost everyone who
had Z-1p and then got MZ-S's has preferred the MZ-S.  Trust me, you
will be much happier in the Nikon camp rather than to continue to be
frustrated by Pentax meanderings.  The difference in glass is not that
significant.  Make the switch and enjoy photography again.


Bruce



Thursday, August 22, 2002, 6:24:38 AM, you wrote:

AL> ----- Original Message -----
AL> From: "Pål Jensen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
AL> Subject: Re: R.I.P. Z-1p


>> Now the Z-1p is simply and old, outdated camera.

AL> Outdated? Yes, definitely. I think you don't see that I have no doubt about
AL> it. What I try to say for all the time is that for me MZ-S is not THAT
AL> significantly improved, especially when compared to its direct opponents,
AL> like Dynaxx 7, EOS 30 or F80. MZ-S is weird even when compared to other MZ
AL> cameras and IMHO what explains its existence is that it's an experimental
AL> product, that was meant to pave a road for something different.
AL> If not, I'll be very dissapointed.
AL> Artur
AL> -
AL> This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
AL> go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
AL> visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .

Reply via email to