Actually, at the time I posted it Tom - hitting reply-all didn't work. Same thing happened to Frank, so I knew it wasn't a "user" problem :)
When I said I was comparing it to MG IV - I was comparing the Gallerie Pearl to their line of REAL photo paper (i.e. NON inkjet - darkroom based photo paper). Hope this clarifies things, Cheers, Dave -----Original Message----- From: tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 12:52 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Ilford Gallerie Pearl - Quick Review > -----Original Message----- > From: David Chang-Sang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Seeing as how the PDML is not really fully back up (i.e. if > you try to > respond to this you'll probably only respond directly to me > and not to the > list) I figure I'll post an OT item: If you hit "reply-all" it seems to work ok. > > I snagged 25 sheets of Ilford Gallerie Pearl paper from > Henry's in Toronto > today (my sales guy gave me a bit of a break on it.. $18.00 > CDN plus tax) - > > I was eager to see how it compares to Ilford's line of > Multigrade RC photo > paper (specifically MG IV .44 Pearl) I'm confused. Ilford makes both inkjet and conventional paper called Galerie. I'm guessing you were comparing the inkjet Galerie to conventional MG? tv
