I'll give him credit for telling it as it is. 

Vic 


In a message dated 9/11/02 10:27:51 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

<< As one Pentax customer, I would care.  I bought the MZ-S because it was the

latest and greatest sort of thing, it's only a camera and I didn't _need_

it....I also bought the AF360FGZ for it, release cable, release timer (still

waiting on it).  Had I known (if our speculations are correct :)) that there

would be a higher model coming out shortly, I would never have bought the

MZ-S or its accessories.  The MZ-5n was fun, but limited as I learned more

and more, and I'd have used it until the camera we speculate on comes out.

I am also not saying there is anything wrong with the MZ-S, but for me

personally, I like to have the biggest and the best.  I don't collect any

sort of equipment, and only get what I need (or just plain want).  I sell my

old lens for better ones (and lose money on it definitely).  I know a lot of

people here are just the opposite, that's fine, but can you see it from my

point of view?  I also only dress with brand name clothes too....heh, flame

me on that! :)


I cannot speak for the LX or anything more than a few years old.


And although I do not have the financial means (without asking my parents

who are rich but don't help me out :)) to switch to a different system or

brand, if Pentax does come out with a higher spec model  (so soon, mind you,

I am not stupid and know that the MZ-S will not be the top forever),  I will

be more likely to jump ship with no problem  to get the latest thing when I

did have the financial means....it's not like I have Pentax tattooed on me.

Hell, I could still stick with better new Pentax stuff.  Call me vain, a

wannabe, rich brat or whatever, because in some cases, I definitely am and

proud!


Anyhow, why are we spending so much time on this anyhow, we should be using

our cameras? :)


And yes Rob, I see what you are saying, I simply don't like it (if anything

happens anyhow)


Highest of high regards, :)


Brad Dobo

 >>

Reply via email to