Yes, Let us travel to Photokina. Let us pay exspenses for shipping people, materials, security and supplies. Let us put it in a locked safe and show no one outside of our own company. Let us waste more money that could be used to turn around this bloated wasteball of a company that turns it's back on its subscribers in the digital community.
Ok, maybe I went too far, IL Bill Daniel J. Matyola wrote: >It doesn't sound very plausible. > >Pål Jensen wrote: > > > >>Some interesting(?) tidbits from the Pentax universe >> >>Apparently, this years Pentax photokina delegation was among the largest ever >including the boss and heaps of engineers. Weird, considering they had nothing to >show. However, it turns out that they indeed showed a LOT but behind closed doors >locked in a large safe (no I'm not making this up; I have this from a guy who was >part of the Pentax delegation but not allowed into the room! Only the utter hot-shots >were allowed apparently). I have no idea about the contents of this safe is but it's >believed it's not the digital K-mount slr. After all, that one is not that secret >(probably already on the distributors order list). >>It was said that Photokina was less seen as a news fair nowadays and more of a trade >show (they are apparently thinking of arranging it every three year instead of every >two). Some informed observes suggest that Pentax will want to celebrate their >corporate name change (and 50th year of slr production) with product releases (they >wil get more attention this way). The speculaters can guess whats in that safe. The >pessimist will insist it's the next $100 P&S while the (incurable) optimist will >believe it is new KAF3 lenses with USM and IS plus matching cameras. >> >> > > > > >
