Of course not! Is this the EBDML? Economics and Business Distribution Mailing List. That doesn't mean we're all correct, and it certainly doesn't prevent us from voicing our opinions.
Brad Dobo ----- Original Message ----- From: "Rubenstein, Bruce M (Bruce)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, October 03, 2002 3:25 PM Subject: re: Why not use the Auto110 line to make a digital system? > They have none of the old tooling, because the camera has been out of production for years. Just to do an identical film camera would cost just as much as to do a new camera - no cost savings. > Nothing personal and just a general observation: I don't think too many people here have the slightest idea of how real products are designed, developed, manufactured, supported, marketed or what any of this costs. > > BR > > From: MPozzi > The news of Olympus and their new Digital > interchangeable lens reflex system got me thinking on > why pentax could not use the old Auto 110 system > (complete system with zoom lenses etc,) and upgrade it > to include AF, and more importantly: Digital. >
