----- Original Message ----- From: "Bob Rapp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Delano Mireles" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 8:03 AM Subject: Re: So are we back? - Repost of question on Fuji Acros 100
> The use of hardening fixers is a matter of taste. The primary usage of > hardening fixers is in machine processing where the negative could be > damaged in the transport. > > For normal hand processing, use of a hardening fixer caused the film to curl > more than if a non hardener fixer were used. Careful handling of the film > and a dip in a photo-flo solution and careful squeeging of the film should > minimise the risks and provide a flatter negative.. > > Bob > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Delano Mireles" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2002 7:54 AM > Subject: So are we back? - Repost of question on Fuji Acros 100 > > > > What happened? > > > > I'm resending a question that I sent right before the list went into > digest > > mode: > > **************************** > > Hi all, > > > > I will be shooting and developing some of this film for the first time > this > > weekend. I downloaded the data sheets off Fuji's site and under the > section > > on developing they only list Fuji Fixers. Not too big a deal I thought at > > first, but then I noticed that they are all hardening fixers. I typically > > use Illford's fixer which is not a hardening fixer. I am hoping someone > can > > fill me in on the differences and how I may need to compensate for them > when > > developing. > > > > Thanks! > > > > Delano > > >
