Hi, I found i got much better shots with Neopan 1600 @ 1600 in xtol 1:3, far better than i ever got with Delta 3200.
Regards, Paul Jones ----- Original Message ----- From: "Glen O'Neal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2002 2:31 PM Subject: RE: B & W recommendations > Paul, > > I haven't yet. But I would love to and plan to try it out very soon. I will > let you know how it turns out. I have really been pleased with the results I > get from the Delta 3200 shot at 1600. > > Glen > > -----Original Message----- > From: Paul Stenquist [mailto:pnstenquist@;comcast.net] > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 1:19 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: B & W recommendations > > > I love Delta 3200 in 6x7. Are you shooting those PJ weddings in medium > format? > Paul > > Glen O'Neal wrote: > > > > Stephen > > > > After shooting B&W photojournalistic wedding for 5 years I have settled on > > Ilford Delta 400 Pro for the prep and reception with flash and Ilford > Delta > > 3200 (rated at 1600) for the ceremony without flash. Never been > > disappointed. I am going to start experimenting with the 3200 at the > > reception. No flash, less obtrusive, more candid. > > > > Just my $.02 > > > > Glen O'Neal > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Stephen Hoffman [mailto:stephen.hoffman@;gte.net] > > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 2:23 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: B & W recommendations > > > > I need help in trying out B & W film. I haven't shot any in years and I > > have been asked to shoot some in a wedding soon. Because of the time > factor > > I can't experiment with too many so I'm looking for advice and hopefully I > > can narrow it down to a few. Thanks. > > > > Stephen Hoffman >
