Most of this exchange has been off-list. Thanks to William Robb it has returned. Please forward complaints to "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
----------------------------------------------------------- Who's insulting whom now? FYI Accesscomm did inform me that they would pursue my complaint if our list administrator forwarded the complaint (because the exchange originated from list chat). I'm not gonna put that on Doug Brewer, because he's too busy with technical aspects of the list, and because it would conflict with his loyalties, ie. I can't expect that he would back me against you because of his hands off approach to list content, and because he doesn't know me from Adam. OTOH, perhaps I should take it up with Doug. I'm being given plenty of motive, and the evidence to make an irrefutable case. Just keep pushing me, I'll be saving your messages, they make such good evidence. Not very clever of you. If anyone cares to know what the situation is just back up to William's message of Sun, 13 Oct 2002 08:56:39-0600 (extracted from the header). At any rate it's the message that ends, "I liked this list a lot more when it was about film and photography. I thought I had useful stuff to contribute back then." My responses occured about 9 hours afterwards, You the reader can judge how awful they were (poor wounded William) ;-) 14 hours later I opened an email in my Inbox (not my PDML folder) to be met with "%#&* you". The rest is history. It would be best if it stayed history. I did not name William in the last message, and as so many of the list claim not to be interested in these matters that leaves only a few who know or care to whom I referred. At least until William responded. Regards, Anthony Farr Forwarded message from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> follows ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Hi Anthony, I had talked to our internet administration group about this, just to see where our policy is. You are correct in assuming that we do have a policy against this kind of behaviour. But, according to what I have been told, I am to tell you to contact the administrator of the mailing list, and you are to pressure them to contact our abuse department through [EMAIL PROTECTED] . I hope that this does not stop you from continuing your efforts, but as I'm sure you understand, there is a procedure for everything and everyone, and if it is followed to the "T", things happen. Iann -- Internet Support Representative Access Communications Co-operative Limited. 2250 Park Street, Regina, SK S4N 7K7 Phone: 306.565.5357, Fax: 306.565.5395 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ----- Original Message ----- From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, 17 October 2002 10:52 PM Subject: Re: Want to play? > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Anthony Farr > Subject: Re: Want to play? > > > > > BTW Brad and I had a brief correspondence of 5 or 6 emails > recently, because > > he wanted to clarify some things I'd said on-list before he > reacted to them. > > I must say that it was a pleasant contrast to my other > exchanges recently > > where the correspondant could have saved us both a lot of > heatburn by first > > finding out what an on-list remark of mine meant before > telling me "%*!# > > you" in an off-list message :-( > > Listen up twit: > There was no way that post was meant as a compliment, and since > it was taken as an insult, there was a problem with your > concept. > Why don't you dry up and stop drooling about how Mr. Meanie told > you where to go? > > Oh yes, and stop telling me about how intellectually superior > you are in private posts. I don't believe it, and likely never > will. > > It would appear that my ISP figured it out, why can't you? > > You seem like a smart guy, you should be able to figure it out > too. Apply some of that superior intellect you claim to possess > > Regards > > William (still at [EMAIL PROTECTED]) Robb > >
