frank theriault wrote: > > Hi, Keith, > > I really got it as a "fun" lens anyway, especially for the price I paid - not > a steal, but not bad either. So, I don't think I'll be overly critical of > it. As with pretty much all of my lenses, the real limitation will be behind > the viewfinder! <vbg> > > From your comments and experience, I should be satisfied with what I got. > > Have fun in Hawaii!!
I guarantee it! <g> In addition to my MG, I'm taking a brand new Leica C1 (it's maiden voyage, to see if IT goes on eBay or not) and my trusty Seiko-Epson PC750Z digital! What a menangerie! keith > cheers, > frank > > Keith Whaley wrote: > > > I have that very one. I've used it in my MG. On the one hand, I am not > > overly impressed, yet not sufficiently disappointed in it to write it > > up on eBay! > > Reason is, with all the shots I took, none were overly contrasty, nor > > were they quite washed out looking, either. > > Most everything was sort of 'snapshotty.' > > Oddly enough, not too much distortion, as I had expected. I was > > careful to not tilt the lens axis upward too much, but still I > > expected a lot more distortion than I got... > > Yes, I know, the rather insipid photos were probably due to my choice > > of subjects, and I ought to take a lot more before making up my mind. > > I will when I go to Hawaii in a week. > > I'll report back! <g> > > > > -- > "The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist > fears it is true." -J. Robert > Oppenheimer
