Here we go again. I have pushed C41 quite well, by two stops, and the thread went on for ages. I posted pictures and some folk suggested I hadn't underexposed, or of having metered the subject incorrectly. I spoke to the Tetenal technical people and they agreed, to with a few percent of my calculations, to the increased time in the developer --> +20% per stop. I won't go on with this. Its likely to lead to a boring repetition.
Dr E D F Williams http://personal.inet.fi/cool/don.williams Author's Web Site and Photo Gallery Updated: March 30, 2002 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bill Owens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, November 29, 2002 4:37 AM Subject: Re: Is it possible to "pull" C41 film > I'm probably not someone to answer this question, but here goes. > > My understanding is that C41 cannot really be pushed or pulled with > satisfactory results. However the latitude of most C41 films can handle > overexposure better than under. If it were me, I'd process it normally and > use Photoshop for any corrections that may be needed. > > Bill > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "J. C. O'Connell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, November 28, 2002 9:21 PM > Subject: Is it possible to "pull" C41 film > > > > Made a bonehead mistake today. Shot 4 rolls of > > film at ISO 100 (mostly flash), Problem was the > > last roll was ISO 400 film ( Fuji NPH). Should > > I be okay with the 2 stop overexposure on the last > > roll or is the a way to have that roll "pulled" > > during deveolpment. Theyre pretty important > > shots so I'd like to salvage if possible. > > JCO > > > >
