Cheers
Shaun
Bruce Dayton wrote:
Shaun, I dunno...when I bought mine, I got the 1.4X-L at the same time. It isn't that hard to figure out what the lens can do.One other way to look at it is to see what else you need to spend money on to see if the converter is really the next thing on your list. Perhaps a good tripod head that works well with the lens, or a nice monopod (that is how I use mine quite often) or something may be the first order of business. Bruce Friday, December 6, 2002, 2:57:31 AM, you wrote: SC> Figure out what the 400mm can do on it's own first Brad... SC> Cheers SC> Shaun SC> Brad Dobo wrote:I can see the headache coming. I know from you that the 1.4x L fits my lens, but not sure on the 2x L, of course, gonna be tough finding a place that has one to try out. So the quality is worse at 2x then..hmmm.....and 800mm was so tempting. ~600mm isn't bad I suppose :) May stick with the better and compatible 1.4x L. Thanks for the info Bruce. Brad ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bruce Dayton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Brad Dobo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, December 06, 2002 4:38 AM Subject: Re[2]: Already looking at equipment for my 400mm -- TC advice plz!Brad, The L converters have less negative impact on your image (especially vignetting and contrast loss) than the S or 3rd party. Only for lenses that can use them. I would strongly recommend going with the L over the S. Remember that not only light loss, but quality loss is greater with a 2X vs. a 1.4X. Bruce Friday, December 6, 2002, 12:39:05 AM, you wrote: BD> Well, seems I have much to learn! I always wondered about the Lconverters,BD> as I always saw only the short ones. Is the L necessary for the400/5.6?BD> As for the 1.4x and the 2x is there a difference in optical quality?RobBD> pointed out the light issue, but I would be using it during brightdays IBD> would imagine. I guess I'm a bit greedy now. Having the ability toshootBD> at 800mm sounds like it could be a lot of fun, but I understand not so BD> practical. BD> Brad BD> ----- Original Message ----- BD> From: "Bruce Dayton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> BD> To: "Brad Dobo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> BD> Sent: Friday, December 06, 2002 3:22 AM BD> Subject: Re: Already looking at equipment for my 400mm -- TC adviceplz!Brad, I have the 1.4X-L converter. It works wonderfully with the A 400/5.6. The L converters have an extended snout that fits inside the rear of the lens. I know with the 1.4 that the loss of quality is very minimal. It is a great converter. I don't know for a fact that the 2X-L fits properly. I would guess it would, but am not positive. As to the issue of tripod mounted with MZ-S/Grip. No issue at all. The lens is bigger/heavier than the body. The lens mounts to the tripod and the camera just hangs off the end. So adding a converter doesn't have any real impact. HTH, Bruce Thursday, December 5, 2002, 11:35:57 PM, you wrote: BD> Hey, BD> Even though I have not received the lens yet, I'm looking atgettingBD> the 2xBD> teleconverter. Anyone (Bruce D. etc) know if this is a good idea?BD> This isBD> quite new to me, not the converter and light, etc, but the weightorBD> stressBD> and balance when mounted on a tripod with the MZ-S w/grip? ThiswouldBD> beBD> the first lens I would have use (while limited) for a TC. BD> Brad BD> ****************************************************** BD> Brad W. Dobo, HBA (Eds.) BD> Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] BD> ICQ#: 16566668..
-- ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Shaun Canning Cultural Heritage Services High Street, Broadford, Victoria, 3658. www.heritageservices.com.au/ Phone: 0414-967644 e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] My images can be seen at www.photo.net/photodb/folder?folder_id=238096 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++