Please read any of the following: 1) On www.powerdns.com, or directly http://www.powerdns.com/news/PowerDNS-Rootservers.aspx
2) http://mailman.powerdns.com/pipermail/pdns-users/2010-April/006674.html "Repeated statement on non-impact of DNSSEC rollout on PowerDNS Software". This also links to the original explanation from March. 3) https://lists.dns-oarc.net/pipermail/dns-operations/2010-April/005470.html "PowerDNS & Most Other non-BIND Software Not Impacted by May 5th Root Servers Event" The OARC testing site is not clear on what its results mean. Its results mean you would have a problem if you had been running BIND and were seeing these results. But you are not. Kind regards, Bert Hubert On Tue, May 04, 2010 at 11:19:36AM -0400, Barron, Josh wrote: > Hello all, > > > > I've been asked to look into the issues stemming from the changes being > rolled out in a testing form at the root name servers starting May 5th > and permanently applied on July 1st > > > > >From my basic reading of the issue, it appears that packet reply sizes > will be much bigger starting May 5th, and some servers / routers & > firewalls may not be equipped to handle it. > > > > A test of our recursive server (running PDNS) shows it appears we are > indeed affected by this. Does anyone have any advice on what the actual > issue is? Is it our servers, our router? The information out there is > kind of vague at best. > > > > Below (results of a test to our server using dig and another server): > > > > [jbar...@ops-ns1-srv01 ~]$ dig +short rs.dns-oarc.net txt > > rst.x476.rs.dns-oarc.net. > > rst.x485.x476.rs.dns-oarc.net. > > rst.x490.x485.x476.rs.dns-oarc.net. > > "Tested at 2010-05-04 15:05:36 UTC" > > "216.222.1.2 DNS reply size limit is at least 490" > > "216.222.1.2 lacks EDNS, defaults to 512" > > > > [jbar...@ops-ns1-srv01 ~]$ dig @4.2.2.2 +short rs.dns-oarc.net txt > > rst.x3827.rs.dns-oarc.net. > > rst.x3837.x3827.rs.dns-oarc.net. > > rst.x3843.x3837.x3827.rs.dns-oarc.net. > > "Tested at 2010-05-04 15:08:42 UTC" > > "192.221.163.127 sent EDNS buffer size 4096" > > "192.221.163.127 DNS reply size limit is at least 3843" > > > > > > Thanks so much! > > Josh Barron > > American Fiber Systems > > _______________________________________________ > Pdns-users mailing list > Pdns-users@mailman.powerdns.com > http://mailman.powerdns.com/mailman/listinfo/pdns-users _______________________________________________ Pdns-users mailing list Pdns-users@mailman.powerdns.com http://mailman.powerdns.com/mailman/listinfo/pdns-users