----- Missatge original ----- > Even so, it seems it should be filed, if not as a bug, then as a > critical feature request, because the back end SHOULD handle > connectivity with the associated layer. Otherwise, one should monitor > LDAP and, even at the slightest unavailability, he should restart > pdns, which is totally impractical. >
i agree this is critical but usually in a large environment you dont have just one LDAP service. i always configure pdns with at least two ldap servers located at different machines/places. ldap-host=ldap1:389 ldap2:389 regards, abosch _______________________________________________ Pdns-users mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.powerdns.com/mailman/listinfo/pdns-users
