So bottom line taking in consideration that having mysql replication would not be an issue. Is one or other preferred? And if yes what would be the reasons?
Peter > On 14 Apr 2015, at 08:22, Aki Tuomi <cmo...@youzen.ext.b2.fi> wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 03:23:04AM +0300, Keresztes Péter-Zoltán wrote: >> Hello, >> >> Can anyone explain me if there is any difference between having a >> master-slave replication on authoritative servers and simple NATIVE servers >> with backend replication? >> >> regards, >> Peter > > The biggest differences are that with master-slave you do not need anything > but > tcp/53 and udp/53 open between the servers (both ways), it can interoperate > with other DNS server products. There is no transport security implied other > than provided by TSIG. You also need to do serial number management to cause > transfers. > > Native replication is backend-specific and all limitations and benefits are > of the backend in question. F.ex. if you use mysql replication, you get near > instant changes in your slaves. No serial number management is required. > > Aki > >> Pdns-users mailing list >> Pdns-users@mailman.powerdns.com >> http://mailman.powerdns.com/mailman/listinfo/pdns-users >> _______________________________________________ Pdns-users mailing list Pdns-users@mailman.powerdns.com http://mailman.powerdns.com/mailman/listinfo/pdns-users
