hi Jacek > as far as I know, the team is focusing on stability, performance and > usability of PDT - picking the bugzilla bugs appropriately. > Are there any particular issues you believe deserve more effort?
Well that sounds reasonable. The only nasty issue that I experience from time to time is the error "Zero or negative length StyleRange", but that has already been noticed (https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=331220). 2.2 is by far the best release of pdt. I am quite happy :) Personally I think pdt would benefit from adding refactoring functionality. I looked at the LTK-toolkit, I guess we could use this? I am not a pdt developer so forgive my ignorance but is it possible to access PDT's language model from within LTK's extension points? I think this would be needed if you are about to change a class name and you want to update the file {name, location} automatically. > I'm sorry about the e-mails about outdated plans. It's unfortunate :-( > > ________________________________________ > From: [email protected] [[email protected]] on behalf of > Sjaak Eenhuis [[email protected]] > Sent: 18 January 2011 21:33 > To: pdt-dev > Subject: [pdt-dev] pdt roadmap > > Hi everyone, > > I would like to ask if there is a roadmap for pdt. If I am not mistaken, from > time to time we get a message on this list that the project plan is outdated > or missing. > At least http://www.eclipse.org/projects/project-plan.php?projectid=tools.pdt > hasn't changed for a long time :D > > Do we have any special plans for the next pdt version? > _______________________________________________ pdt-dev mailing list [email protected] https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/pdt-dev
