Hi Jacek, thanks for the info. Could this nightly updatesite be mentioned here? http://www.eclipse.org/projects/project.php?id=tools.pdt
Looks like there's quite some confusion going an among users: http://www.eclipse.org/forums/index.php/t/366539/ regards -robert On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 9:33 AM, Jacek Pospychała <jace...@zend.com> wrote: > hi, > you're right there's been a bit of mess with PDT lately. > Although we continuously work on the project, there was nobody since > Indigo SR2 to update project version (3.0.1->3.1) and promote it regularly, > hence Juno release train ended up with same PDT package as Indigo SR2, > dated 2012-01-11. > > We want to fix this for Juno SR1, which will have PDT version 3.1.1. Our > friendly Zend QA team is currently verifying about 200 fixed bugs from last > months in PDT bugzilla. We just started publishing nightly builds update > site at http://download.eclipse.org/tools/pdt/updates/3.1.1/nightly so > you can give it a try as well. It's also available as zip at pdt downloads. > In June we also provided a fresh all-in-one package at > www.zend.com/pdt/downloads if you prefer a complete bundle. > > Jacek Pospychala, PDT lead > > ------------------------------ > *From:* pdt-dev-boun...@eclipse.org [pdt-dev-boun...@eclipse.org] on > behalf of Mike Milinkovich [mike.milinkov...@eclipse.org] > *Sent:* 05 July 2012 15:23 > *To:* 'Cross project issues' > *Cc:* 'Tools PMC mailing list'; pdt-dev@eclipse.org > *Subject:* Re: [pdt-dev] [cross-project-issues-dev] Does this behavior > violate EPL or community prinicples > > +Tools PMC (note bolded comment below) > > +PDT dev list (please see > https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=383977) > > > > *From:* cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org [mailto: > cross-project-issues-dev-boun...@eclipse.org] *On Behalf Of *zhu kane > *Sent:* July-05-12 1:53 AM > *To:* Cross project issues > *Subject:* Re: [cross-project-issues-dev] Does this behavior violate EPL > or community prinicples > > > > I also appreciate the effort of PDT team made, it's great to release > maintenance version in Indigo SR2 time frame. And it still works well in > Juno. > > I don't think development team is possible to mess up the release version. > Anyway *I would like to see comments from PDT and PMC*. > > Mengxin > > On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 3:04 PM, Ed Willink <e...@willink.me.uk> wrote: > > Hi > > The situation doesn't seem nearly as bad as you make out. > > The public promoted builds on http://www.eclipse.org/pdt/downloads/ show > a 2-Jan-2012 3.0.0 Maintenance build as the most recent and examining the > ZIP content reveals 3.0.1 content. > > Installing the Juno release train installs a 2-Jan-2012 3.0.1, which > correlates with the Eclipse CVS. > > The Hudson build job > https://hudson.eclipse.org/hudson/job/cbi-pdt-3.0-juno/changes shows > active public development of 3.1 in the Eclipse CVS. > > So it seems there are some releng difficulties that cause 3.0.1 to be > listed as 3.0.0 on the download page, and some over-enthusiasm that causes > a 3.0.1 contribution to be called 3.1. > > A rename can fix the download page. A resubmission of the review slides > can fix the misleading version claim. Perhaps Kepler should be 3.2 to avoid > more confusion. > > Regards > > Ed Willink > > > > On 04/07/2012 06:17, zhu kane wrote: > > Hello community, > > I hesitated about raising such question in here. But I can't get any > response from PDT project even if filing critical bug for it[1]. > > PDT team announced PDT 3.1 was released[2] with Juno simultaneous release. > PDT 3.1 also is listed in highlighted Juno project > list[3]. But none of Eclipse users knows how to install it. > > I would like to believe it's just a bug, however nobody of PDT project > takes action for it. In my understanding all projects of Eclipse.org are > open source, everybody can browse the latest source code even under > developing. I'm astonished that I can't find any commit related to PDT 3.1 > from its source repository[4]. Looks like PDT 3.1 doesn't have any public > nightly build and integration build. I only find a build[5] for 3.0 in > Hudson. > > I'm wondering whether Eclipse.org/EPL allows a project under it that is > not really open source and just declared its new release. Hope experienced > people help resolve my doubts. > > Thank you. > > [1] https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=383977 > [2] https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/attachment.cgi?id=216929 > [3] http://eclipse.org/juno/projects.php > [4] > http://dev.eclipse.org/viewcvs/viewvc.cgi/org.eclipse.pdt/features/org.eclipse.php-feature/?root=Tools_Project > [5] https://hudson.eclipse.org/hudson/job/cbi-pdt-3.0-juno/changes > > Mengxin Zhu > > > > _______________________________________________ > pdt-dev mailing list > pdt-dev@eclipse.org > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/pdt-dev > >
_______________________________________________ pdt-dev mailing list pdt-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/pdt-dev
