Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
"Joshua" == Joshua Schmidlkofer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Joshua> We don't have a problem. People complaining have the problem. Go
Joshua> away. Be healed.
"We don't have a problem with how loud our music is at our party.
It's all the neighbors of our block that have the problem. Go away.
What? Why are the cops here?"
The problem is that you *usurped* the name of an established group.
This pollutes the namespace. Sure, it isn't *your* problem. You're
just the one being the polluter.
If someone new started writing books with the name "Randal L. Schwartz",
you don't think I'd have a right to wonder the motivation?
After two years of repetetive explaination? Yeah, I would wonder.
However, we aren't publishing books. There is no profit motive here. We
are cool people who want to have a meeting.
Can you find a better analogy? I can't really make any interesting
argument with that one. In fact, it so poorly applies to the situation
and I can't take it further, focus on one (seemingly inconsequential)
point, or do anything to disprove it. It does all that for me.
thanks,
Joshua (Josh)
_______________________________________________
PDXLUG mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.pdxlug.org/mailman/listinfo/pdxlug
IRC: irc.freenode.net #pdxlug
