Hi Shane, So I tried to do what you suggested but it doesn't seem to be working for me. I created a "files.txt" file and downloaded the script and put it in the base directory of the bcst (I also tried putting it in the main directory). Both my excel and .txt files are in the data directory of the bcst and I created an "output" directory in the bcst. When I run the script in Pebl, the "stderr" file states "Unable to find file [files.txt]. Exiting PEBL because of captured signal." and I get an excel file with the 4 headers but no data. Can it be that I am putting certain files in the wrong place or listing the filenames in the "files.txt" incorrectly? Do I need to change anything in the script or just run as is?
I apologize if these questions ridiculous, I know nothing about computers. Thanks in advance, Rob ________________________________________ From: Shane Mueller <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2015 8:50 PM To: Robert Gabrys Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Pebl-list] BCST - PEBL Version 0.13 and PEBL Version 0.14 The PEBL perseverative error rule uses a very simple rule--responses to the previous rule that are incorrect. The PAR instructions are very complicated, easy to get wrong when hand-coded. The function that does this coding is separated out in the bcst file, so it would be possible to read in the data file and run the coding on an existing file. The attached script will process 0.13 bcst files listed line-by-line in a text file called files.txt. Put a text file and this script in the base directory, put the data files in a data\ directory, and make another directory called 'output'--this is where the recoded data files will be stored. Shane > Hello! > > > I initially started running my experiments using version 0.13 and then > upgraded to version 0.14. I noticed that version 0.14 has new computations > of perseverations according to PAR rules. It seems that the perseverative > responses and perseverative errors scores between PEBL and PAR are > considerably different. What is the difference between the two > calculations of perseveration? Also, is there any way I can convert my > perseverative responses from version 0.13 (PEBL rules) to the PAR rules? > > > Thank you in advance, > > > Rob > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > _______________________________________________ > Pebl-list mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pebl-list > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Pebl-list mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pebl-list
