Interesting! And thanks for the explanation. :-)

New food for thought for me.

Cheers!



Met vriendelijke groeten / Best regards,

Ger Hobbelt

--------------------------------------------------
web:    http://www.hobbelt.com/
        http://www.hebbut.net/
mail:   g...@hobbelt.com
mobile: +31-6-11 120 978
--------------------------------------------------

On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 12:17 AM, Juancarlo Añez <apal...@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 6:08 PM, Juancarlo Añez <apal...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I haven't seen the approach implemented in TatSu mentioned anywhere in
>> relation to PEG, but I think it is similar to some of the ones used with
>> pushdown automata (sorry; I know that pushing non-terminals onto the front
>> of the input stream is an old idea, but I can't remember the source).
>
>
> Memory is coming back. It's either in the Dragon book, or in one of the
> more formal books by Hopcroft et al.
>
> Symbols don't get pushed back onto the input stream. It is the stack which
> may contain terminals and non-terminals. In one of the strategies, the
> initial state of the stack is the input stream.
>
> I apologize, but I won't have time to research the references until next
> weekend, or later. For now I'm just happy sharing that the approach I knew
> would work, did work.
>
> Cheers!
>
>
> --
> Juancarlo *Añez*
>
_______________________________________________
PEG mailing list
PEG@lists.csail.mit.edu
https://lists.csail.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/peg

Reply via email to