Thank you! But, in just glancing at the two Deely articles that Daniel Brunson supplied, it seems that a much greater correspondence between ALL the Scholastic logicians - which Peirce seems to know in great detail - that Umberto Eco shows to be extremely important in modern logical conceptions AND their misconceptions, e.g., "suppositio" versus "appelatio", "connotation" versus "denotation" which seems to have a great deal of confusion - with synonimity vs. antimony mixed - still today as some scholars state. Gary C. Moore
On Saturday, June 21, 2014 7:38 AM, Gary Fuhrman <[email protected]> wrote: Gary M asks, Is "CP 5.320" in THE ESSENTIAL PEIRCE EP1:57. “Peirce's use of Scholastic terminology” is pervasive, but if there’s a leading expert on it, it’s probably John Deely. gary f.
----------------------------- PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to [email protected] . To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to [email protected] with the line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .
