How fixed is the scientific argument for this law? Certainly in this century there have been some who have chipped away at the idea of entropy as a fixed star in an otherwise fallible (subject to revision) scientific universe. And I am unaware of where Peirce stood on this matter. Were his notions of continuity and logic uneasy in the shadow of the assertion that everything falls apart?
*@stephencrose <https://twitter.com/stephencrose>*
----------------------------- PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to [email protected] . To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to [email protected] with the line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .
