Peircers,

I found the passage I was looking for:

http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/2005-November/003190.html

I'm thinking it may be worth redoing in a blog post
if the graphic gets too mushed over in this format.

I don't think it can be possible to sum up the essence of a symbol any more succinctly than Peirce does here, at least, not in a purely verbal formulation, or an almost purely verbal formulation.

Another thing that always strikes me every time I read these sections of the Kaina Stoicheia is how closely they echo dominant themes from his early work, especially the 1865 and 1866 lectures.

Regards,

Jon

o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o

KS.  Note 9

o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o

| We now come to the genuine sign for which I propose the
| technical designation 'symbol', following a use of that
| word not infrequent among logicians including Aristotle.
|
| A symbol is defined as a sign which is fit to serve
| as such simply because it will be so interpreted.
|
| To recapitulate:
|
|               )                                          ( it possesses
|    An icon    }                                          ( the quality
|               )                                          ( signified.
|               )                                          (
|               )                                          ( it is in real
|               )                                          ( reaction
|    An index   > is a sign fit to be used as such because < with the
|               )                                          ( object
|               )                                          ( denoted.
|               )                                          (
|               )                                          ( it determines
|    A symbol   )                                          ( the interpretant
|               )                                          ( sign.
|
| C.S. Peirce, ["Kaina Stoicheia"], NEM 4, 243
|
| C.S. Peirce, ["Kaina Stoicheia"], MS 517 (1904), pp. 235-263 in:
| Carolyn Eisele (ed.), 'The New Elements of Mathematics by
| Charles S. Peirce, Volume 4, Mathematical Philosophy',
| Mouton, The Hague, 1976.
|
| Cf. "New Elements", pp. 300-324 in 'The Essential Peirce,
| Volume 2 (1893-1913)', Peirce Edition Project (eds.),
| Indiana University Press, Bloomington, IN, 1998.

o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o

BTW, here is one of the contexts in which we took this passage up:

KS. Kaina Stoicheia

00. http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/2005-September/thread.html#3063
00. http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/2005-October/thread.html#3075
00. http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/2005-November/thread.html#3183
00. http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/2005-December/thread.html#3274

01. http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/2005-September/003063.html
02. http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/2005-September/003065.html
03. http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/2005-October/003075.html
04. http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/2005-October/003090.html
05. http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/2005-November/003183.html
06. http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/2005-November/003186.html
07. http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/2005-November/003187.html
08. http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/2005-November/003189.html
09. http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/2005-November/003190.html
10. http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/2005-November/003207.html
11. http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/2005-November/003208.html
12. http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/2005-November/003222.html
13. http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/2005-November/003253.html
14. http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/2005-November/003261.html
15. http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/2005-November/003264.html
16. http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/2005-November/003265.html
17. http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/2005-December/003274.html
18. http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/2005-December/003277.html
19. http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/2005-December/003278.html
20. http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/2005-December/003279.html
21. http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/2005-December/003283.html
22. http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/2005-December/003359.html
23. http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/2005-December/003360.html

o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~o

academia: http://independent.academia.edu/JonAwbrey
my word press blog: http://inquiryintoinquiry.com/
inquiry list: http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/
isw: http://intersci.ss.uci.edu/wiki/index.php/JLA
oeiswiki: http://www.oeis.org/wiki/User:Jon_Awbrey
facebook page: https://www.facebook.com/JonnyCache
-----------------------------
PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L 
to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to peirce-L@list.iupui.edu . To 
UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to l...@list.iupui.edu with the 
line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at 
http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .




Reply via email to