This snippet from another thread: Frederik says, "Peirce refused nominalism and psychologism often, if not always together. Peirce refused both - with the upshot that his naturalism automatically includes thought, logic, semiotics, and mind as intrinsic aspects"
I want to reiterate my position that the first term of my core triad Reality Ethics Aesthetics accords with what the above representation ascribes to Naturalism. I believe all is included in Reality including falsity or unreality, nature, thought, logic and so forth. Reality is the best inclusive term for one who is not a nominalist. It is the foundational term for a triad that includes, though in reverse order Ethics and Aesthetics), the two areas CSP eventually tagged as normative sciences. Following the current discussions, I am more and more convinced that Triadic Philosophy is an apt extension of pragmaticism. Just as I think the gist of Frederik's book is an apt extension of our understanding of life and what it consists of in essence. Explanatory note -For the sake of clarity, I will attach Triadic Philosophy to my public posts even if I am moved to respond to thoughts in other threads. My use of terms common to Peirce is hardly apposite in some contexts. Finally, on October 23 my short book Triadic Primer will appear as a Kindle publication. I am glad to make it available free as a Word attachment to any who request it via email. My quid pro quo would be a brief statement I could at my discretion include in the published work. Cheers, S *@stephencrose <https://twitter.com/stephencrose>*
----------------------------- PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to peirce-L@list.iupui.edu . To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to l...@list.iupui.edu with the line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .
