Howard,

Thanks for the link to your paper provided by your 4/5 biosemiotics email
which I just finished reading.  Although there are many elements of your
theory of biological information with I like, there are some I find
difficult to accept:

 H: “The general concept of information does not belong in the category of
universal and inexorable physical laws but in the category of initial
conditions and boundary conditions. . . . . “


S:  I remember arguing with you on this same point years ago on the OCA
list, I believe it was.  I can  see  that physical laws and
initial/boundary conditions  are different, but I don’t see how we can say
that the  concept of “information” does not apply to the former but only to
the latter.  To me, both the Newton’s laws of motion and their
initial/boundary conditions entailed by their specific applications carry
information because they are both signs standing to somebody for something
other than themselves.

I believe that there are two kinds of biological information --- static and
dynamic informations --- the former can be identified with the information
carried by Prigogine’s “equilibrium structures” (e.g., DNA sequence
information, 3-D structures of proteins; hence to be called “equilibrium”
information) and the latter with the information carried by his
“dissipative structures” (e.g., waveforms of sounds, chemical
concentrations, etc.; hence to be called “dissipative” information).
 “Equilibrium” information is rate- and energy-independent as you have been
correctly pointing out, unlike “dissipative” information, such as the mRNA
concentration-wave patterns measured with microarrays that critically
depend on rates and energy dissipation.  It is well –established (i) that
the concentrations of mRNA molecules in living cells are determined by the
balance of two opposing processes – transcription and transcript
degradation and (ii) that many cell functions are determined by
intracellular levels of mRNA, leading to the so-called "IDS-cell function
identity hypothesis" [1, 2].



In conclusion, I would like to suggest that

(i) there are at least two kinds of biological information active in living
cells – quilibrium information (I_e) and dissipative information (I_d),

(ii) I_e is energy- and rate-independent in that the symbol strings are
iso-energetic, and

(iii) cell functions depend on I_d produced by “activating” or “reading”
I_e driven by energy-dissipating processes called transcription controlled
by environmental factors, thus leading to the fusion of the genetic and
the  environmental informations in specific cell functions.




References:

   [1] Ji, S. (2012).  Molecular Theory of the Living Cell: Concepts,
Molecular Mechanisms and Biomedical Applications.  Springer, New York.  Pp.
398-405.
   [2] Ji, S. (1985).  The Bhopalator – A Molecular Model of the Living
Cell Based on the Concepts of Conformons and Dissipative Structures.
<http://www.conformon.net/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/Bhopalator_11.pdf> *J.
theoret. Biol. **116**:*399-426.  See Step 20 in Figure 1.  PDF available
at http://www.conformon.net under Publicaitons > Refereed Journal Articles.

-- 
Sungchul Ji, Ph.D.

Associate Professor of Pharmacology and Toxicology
Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology
Ernest Mario School of Pharmacy
Rutgers University
Piscataway, N.J. 08855
732-445-4701

www.conformon.net
-----------------------------
PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L 
to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to [email protected] . To 
UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to [email protected] with the 
line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at 
http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .




Reply via email to