Post : Systems Of Interpretation • 1
http://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2016/03/28/systems-of-interpretation-%e2%80%a2-1/
Date : March 28, 2016 at 11:00 am

Peircers,

I'm thinking the question Val pointed up with regard
to Mike's project is worth pursuing more methodically,
so I decided to devote a blog series to it.  I'm using
the title of a long-recurring theme in my own efforts
to grapple with related problems of communication.

MB:http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.science.philosophy.peirce/18534
EVD:http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.science.philosophy.peirce/18540

Questions have arisen about the variety of diagrams and figures that
are currently found in common use to represent triadic sign relations
in Peircean semiotics.  What do they mean?  Which is best?  Among the
most popular pictures, some use geometric triangles while others use
the sort of graph-theoretic diagram that Peirce used in his systems
of logical graphs to represent triadic relations.

Diagrams and figures, like all signs, can be useful in communicating
their intended interpretant signs and thus in coordinating attention
to their intended objects, but only in communities of interpretation
that comprehend their conventions of interpretation.  Conventions of
interpretation are, by comparison, far more difficult to communicate.

In that light, one of the prerequisites to the possibility of
communication in this area would be to ask ourselves what are
the conventions of interpretation enabling this species of
diagrams and figures.

Regards,

Jon

--

academia: http://independent.academia.edu/JonAwbrey
my word press blog: http://inquiryintoinquiry.com/
isw: http://intersci.ss.uci.edu/wiki/index.php/JLA

-----------------------------
PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L 
to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to peirce-L@list.iupui.edu . To 
UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to l...@list.iupui.edu with the 
line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at 
http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .




Reply via email to