Edwinia: Your horrendous mis-representation of the meaning of my sentence kills all desire to explore this issue.
Cheers Jerry > On Jan 29, 2017, at 5:13 PM, Edwina Taborsky <tabor...@primus.ca> wrote: > > Jerry Chandler - calm down. You are evading the issue, which is, that you > claimed that 'many, if not most, biosemioticians are nominalists.' I question > this claim, since biosemiotics is based around the semiosis of Peirce - which > rejects nominalism. > > So I ask yet again, what's your evidence for your claim? > > Edwina > > ----------------------------- > PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON > PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to peirce-L@list.iupui.edu > <mailto:peirce-L@list.iupui.edu> . To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to > PEIRCE-L but to l...@list.iupui.edu <mailto:l...@list.iupui.edu> with the > line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at > http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm > <http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm> . > > > >
----------------------------- PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to peirce-L@list.iupui.edu . To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to l...@list.iupui.edu with the line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .
