List: Thanks to Jon for his meaningful scholarship on this term.
Whose problem (definition of quasi-mind”) is this? Edwinia’s? Jon’s? or is merely another example of the qualities of CSP’s mental states? Cheers jerry > On Feb 19, 2018, at 12:16 PM, Edwina Taborsky <tabor...@primus.ca> wrote: > > > Jon - just a few of my concerns about your definitions - but - I'm not going > to get into another endless debate. I'm sure you'll respond - but - we'll > have to leave it with that. > > You have informed us, in this thread that: > > .Perfect Sign = a Quasi-mind > > - the Quasi-Mind is a bundle of habits capable of habit change by experience > [Note: this rules out Firstness in this situation] > > - Mind=Quasi-mind > > - Agent= Quasi-mind > > - Utterer and Interpreter are individual Quasi-minds that become welded in > the sign > > - the Sign = a medium of communication of a Form between them > > - Form = 1stness. > > I don't know if you can see the contradictions and problems in these > definitions. > > Edwina > > > > > > > > > > ----------------------------- > PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON > PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to peirce-L@list.iupui.edu > . To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to l...@list.iupui.edu > with the line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at > http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .
----------------------------- PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to peirce-L@list.iupui.edu . To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message not to PEIRCE-L but to l...@list.iupui.edu with the line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of the message. More at http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .
