BODY { font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:12px;
}Jon,list
Yes, I do think you are right to make such a differentiation. Names
don't matter...
But I think that any 'corpus literalism' whether early or late, runs
the risk of moving into conceptualism/nominalism, using the text as
the 'reality' rather than the objective world about which he wrote -
as the reality.
And as you say - the revolutions in thought - which I agree with you
were already active - were an integral part of Peirce's full corpus,
and his theories, in my view, fit well into these movements, which
include quantum theory, complex dynamics, molecular biology, and
societal and economic complex dynamics etc.
Edwina
On Sat 13/06/20 9:04 AM , Jon Awbrey [email protected] sent:
Edwina, Robert, Peirce List ...
I think we have to distinguish “late corpus literalism” —
I'll let that go till I find a better name for it — from
“full corpus reading of Peirce's technical works placing
them in the context of mathematical developments, indeed
revolutions, already proceeding full tilt when he joined
the fray, to which he added many more shots heard 'round
the world, as fortune would have it all but forgotten in
the years of reactionary nominalism that followed in the
aftermath, as it were” — I'll let that go until I find a
better name for it.
Regards,
Jon
On 6/13/2020 7:57 AM, Edwina Taborsky wrote:
>
> Robert, list - yes, you are right. Such a 'corset' approach of
> purity, rejecting new areas of the Peircean framework, would
indeed
> be a denial of the spirit of Peirce's work. It would transform it
> from being a framework for the analysis of the universe and its
> infrastructure into a closed text in-itself.
>
> But my question is: who would be the official gatekeepers of the
> 'pure literalist approach'? Are they self-appointed or appointed
in
> some other way? And how would these gatekeepers define what is
'The
> Truth' vs what is 'Heresy'? What would be their criteria? And of
> course - who judges the Gatekeepers?
>
> Edwina
>
> On Sat 13/06/20 4:10 AM , robert marty [email protected]
[1] sent:
> Jon, List
>
> Jon I suppose that in this search for coherence in "certain
aspects
> of Peirce's thought" you do not rule out using mathematical
objects
> which are appeared in ulterior development of this discipline
that
> was not at his disposal more than 100 years ago? Otherwise,
wouldn't
> the pure approach literalist be a true corset for research
completely
> contrary to the foundations of his thought ?
>
> Best regards,
>
> Robert
> --
> Honorary Professor ; PhD Mathematics ; PhD Philosophy
> fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Marty [9]
> de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Fran%C3%A7ois_Raymond_Marty
> semiotiquedure.online [10] ; semioticadura.online [11] ;
> hardsemiotics.online [12]
>
>
> Links:
> ------
> [1]
>
http://webmail.primus.ca/javascript:top.opencompose(\'[email protected]
[2]','','','')
> [2] http://www.LinkedIn.com/in/JonAlanSchmidt [3]
> [3] http://twitter.com/JonAlanSchmidt [4]
> [4]
>
http://webmail.primus.ca/javascript:top.opencompose(\'[email protected]
[5]','','','')
> [5] http://www.gnusystems.ca/Lowells.htm [6]
> [6] https://www.degruyter.com/view/title/552477 [7]
> [7] http://www.gnusystems.ca/TS/TWindex.htm [8]
> [8] http://gnusystems.ca/wp/ [9]
> [9] https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Marty [10]
> [10] http://semiotiquedure.online [11]
> [11] http://semioticadura.online [12]
> [12] http://hardsemiotics.online [13]
>
Links:
------
[1]
http://webmail.primus.ca/javascript:top.opencompose(\'[email protected]\',\'\',\'\',\'\')
[2]
http://webmail.primus.ca/parse.php?redirect=http%3A%2F%2Fwebmail.primus.ca%2Fjavascript%3Atop.opencompose%28%5C%27jonalanschmidt%40gmail.com
[3]
http://webmail.primus.ca/parse.php?redirect=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.LinkedIn.com%2Fin%2FJonAlanSchmidt
[4]
http://webmail.primus.ca/parse.php?redirect=http%3A%2F%2Ftwitter.com%2FJonAlanSchmidt
[5]
http://webmail.primus.ca/parse.php?redirect=http%3A%2F%2Fwebmail.primus.ca%2Fjavascript%3Atop.opencompose%28%5C%27gnox%40gnusystems.ca
[6]
http://webmail.primus.ca/parse.php?redirect=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.gnusystems.ca%2FLowells.htm
[7]
http://webmail.primus.ca/parse.php?redirect=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.degruyter.com%2Fview%2Ftitle%2F552477
[8]
http://webmail.primus.ca/parse.php?redirect=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.gnusystems.ca%2FTS%2FTWindex.htm
[9]
http://webmail.primus.ca/parse.php?redirect=http%3A%2F%2Fgnusystems.ca%2Fwp%2F
[10]
http://webmail.primus.ca/parse.php?redirect=https%3A%2F%2Ffr.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FRobert_Marty
[11]
http://webmail.primus.ca/parse.php?redirect=http%3A%2F%2Fsemiotiquedure.online
[12]
http://webmail.primus.ca/parse.php?redirect=http%3A%2F%2Fsemioticadura.online
[13]
http://webmail.primus.ca/parse.php?redirect=http%3A%2F%2Fhardsemiotics.online
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
► PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON
PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to [email protected] .
► To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message NOT to PEIRCE-L but to [email protected]
with no subject, and with the sole line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of
the message. More at http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .
► PEIRCE-L is owned by The PEIRCE GROUP; moderated by Gary Richmond; and
co-managed by him and Ben Udell.
