Jon Alan, List "No one" ... I don't know since it was not Gary R. who spoke; but anyway, from now on, there will be at least one, because I am ready to adopt it ... and maybe we should ask ADT what he thinks ...
Regards, Robert Marty Honorary Professor ; PhD Mathematics ; PhD Philosophy fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Marty *https://martyrobert.academia.edu/ <https://martyrobert.academia.edu/>* Le mar. 31 août 2021 à 15:01, Jon Alan Schmidt <jonalanschm...@gmail.com> a écrit : > Robert, List: > > No one is suggesting that *phaneroscopy *falls within the sciences of > review, Gary R. is simply noting that *Peirce's classification of the > sciences* is a work of the sciences of review. Within that classification > in its mature form, phaneroscopy is the first positive science, situated > between mathematics and the normative sciences. > > Regards, > > Jon Alan Schmidt - Olathe, Kansas, USA > Structural Engineer, Synechist Philosopher, Lutheran Christian > www.LinkedIn.com/in/JonAlanSchmidt - twitter.com/JonAlanSchmidt > > On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 4:06 AM robert marty <robert.mart...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Gary R., List >> >> >> >> Your opinion that De Tienne : >> >> >> >> *"**emphasizes in that aspect of his presentation having the purpose of >> positioning phaneroscopy within Peirce's Classification of Sciences, a >> work, btw, of Science of Review, concerned with >> sciences qua scientific disciplines as distinct from how the knowledge of >> each of these will be employed in the actual work of any given scientist or >> group of sciences*.*"* >> >> >> >> seems to me very appropriate; indeed, it completely changes the nature of >> the debate by discarding the conflict because: >> >> >> >> *"By "science of review" is meant the business of those who occupy >> themselves with arranging the results of discovery, beginning with digests, >> and going on to endeavor to form a philosophy of science*."(CP 1.182, AN >> OUTLINE CLASSIFICATION OF THE SCIENCES) >> >> >> By placing the activity of the phaneroscopists in this branch of the >> Classification of Sciences, it not depends directly on the Sciences of >> Discovery and one understands better than the insistence of De Tiennne to >> distance himself from Mathematics. For the "phaneroscopists" would draw >> "the results of discovery,"* without having the responsibility of their >> elaboration* and would import them among the Sciences of Review, in >> which they would assume a necessary work "beginning with digests, and going >> on to endeavor to form a philosophy of science". A critical work quite >> indispensable. >> >> For Peirce, classifications are general, that nobody is enclosed in a >> branch and that each can deploy his activity by passing from one to another >> if he has the desire and the competence. >> >> >> >> Sincerely, >> >> Robert Marty >> Honorary Professor; Ph.D. Mathematics; Ph.D. Philosophy >> fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Marty >> *https://martyrobert.academia.edu/ <https://martyrobert.academia.edu/>* >> > _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ > ► PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON > PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to > peirce-L@list.iupui.edu . > ► To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message NOT to PEIRCE-L but to > l...@list.iupui.edu with UNSUBSCRIBE PEIRCE-L in the SUBJECT LINE of the > message and nothing in the body. More at > https://list.iupui.edu/sympa/help/user-signoff.html . > ► PEIRCE-L is owned by THE PEIRCE GROUP; moderated by Gary Richmond; and > co-managed by him and Ben Udell. >
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ► PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to peirce-L@list.iupui.edu . ► To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message NOT to PEIRCE-L but to l...@list.iupui.edu with UNSUBSCRIBE PEIRCE-L in the SUBJECT LINE of the message and nothing in the body. More at https://list.iupui.edu/sympa/help/user-signoff.html . ► PEIRCE-L is owned by THE PEIRCE GROUP; moderated by Gary Richmond; and co-managed by him and Ben Udell.
