* Comments on the Peirce List slow reading of Joseph Ransdell,
"On the Paradigm of Experience Appropriate for Semiotic",
http://www.cspeirce.com/menu/library/aboutcsp/ransdell/paradigm.htm
IA: Once again, there is a complex of related dichotomies that van Heijenoort
applied to distinguish the Aristotelian-Boolean stream (of which Peirce was
a part, according to Van) from the Fregean, including logic as
calculus/logic
as language, model-theoretic (or intensional)/set-theoretic, (or
extensional,
so as to include both Russell's use of set theory and Frege's
course-of-values
semantic), syntactic/semantic, and, finally, relativism/absolutism.
This has been coming pretty thick and fast, so let me see if I can sift it out.
Aristotelian-Boolean . | Fregean
logic as calculus .... | logic as language
model-theoretic ...... | set-theoretic
intensional .......... | extensional
syntactic ............ | semantic
relative ............. | absolute
Did you intend to align things that way?
Or did you intend them as coordinate axes?
Jon
CC: Arisbe, Inquiry, Peirce List
--
facebook page: https://www.facebook.com/JonnyCache
inquiry list: http://stderr.org/pipermail/inquiry/
mwb: http://www.mywikibiz.com/Directory:Jon_Awbrey
knol profile: http://knol.google.com/k/Jon-Awbrey#
oeiswiki: http://www.oeis.org/wiki/User:Jon_Awbrey
polmic: www.policymic.com/profiles/1110/Jon-Awbrey
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the PEIRCE-L listserv. To
remove yourself from this list, send a message to lists...@listserv.iupui.edu with the
line "SIGNOFF PEIRCE-L" in the body of the message. To post a message to the
list, send it to PEIRCE-L@LISTSERV.IUPUI.EDU
