One last point. I think a final place where Derrida follows Peirce although he doesn't formally acknowledge the connection (unlike the Scotus like Grammatology) is over tone. Most considerations focus purely on the type-token relationship. Peirce famously invokes his trichotomy and has a type-token-tone divide. Tone is almost always ignored in philosophy of language. A lot of what Derrida does during his demonstrative phase (roughly 1973 through the 80's) is to emphasize how tone becomes important, nearly as important to the relationship as the type and the token.

Clark Goble
Lextek International
(801) 375-8332


---
Message from peirce-l forum to subscriber archive@mail-archive.com

Reply via email to