[peirce-l] Re: Sinsign, Legisign, Qualisign

[Benjamin Udell]

Bernard, Gary, list,   How come I never notice these errors until a minute after I send them?   THIS is the triangular arrangement with regard to the "all-ascending" ordering of the 10 classes of signs. A ~ ~ E B ~ ~ ~ J ~ ~ F ~ ~ ~ H C ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ G D ALL-ASCENDING (1-2-3) ORDER Sign with regard to own pheno- menologi- cal categ. (& thus of phen. cat. of potential ref. to obj.) Sign w.r.t. phen. cat. of its ref. to obj. Sign w.r.t. phen. cat. of its interp.'s ref. to obj. Examples qualisigns – iconic – rhematic A. a feeling of "red" / sinsigns    \ iconic – rhematic B. an individual diagram indexical < rhematic C. a spontaneous cry dicentic D. a weathercock or a photograph / legisigns – \ iconic – rhematic E. a diagram apart from its factual individuality  indexical < rhematic F. a demonstrative pronoun dicentic G. a street cry  /  symbolic – \ rhematic H. a common noun dicentic I. a proposition argumental J. a syllogism   Anyway, even with the correction, the triangle below, as I said, isn't the final product.   Best, Ben --- Message from peirce-l forum to subscriber archive@mail-archive.com --- Message from peirce-l forum to subscriber archive@mail-archive.com