Dear jon,
I think that this is the mathematical manifold. It's similar to trasform a
sphere in a plane, create a map of the earth.
But if you trasform B in N you obtain a series of Nat and a series of Nat
with the distance of a unit is the time.
I try to follow you but I'm not a mathematician. I'm more interesting.
Regards
Mauro

Il dom 21 mar 2021, 18:26 Jon Awbrey <[email protected]> ha scritto:

> Dear Mauro,
>
> Here I think Helmut is describing the transition
> from forms of enclosure on a plane sheet of paper,
> such as those used by Peirce and Spencer Brown, to
> their topological duals in the form of rooted trees.
> I gave a brief discussion of this transformation in
> the following couple of places.
>
> Logical Graphs • Introduction
> https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2008/07/29/logical-graphs-1/
>
> Logical Graphs • Duality : Logical and Topological
> https://oeis.org/wiki/Logical_Graphs#Duality:_logical_and_topological
>
> This is the first step we need to carry out in the process
> of converting planar maps to graph-theoretic data structures.
>
> Further transformations will take us from trees to cactus graphs,
> which implement a highly efficient family of logical primitives
> called "minimal negation operators".
>
> Minimal Negation Operator
> https://oeis.org/wiki/Minimal_negation_operator
>
> Regards,
>
> Jon
>
> On 3/21/2021 12:21 PM, Mauro Bertani wrote:
>  > So, if I want transform a circle in a line i have to use a function
>  > f:B_n -> B? This is the base of temporal logic? I'm using f:N_n -> N
>  >
>  > Regards
>  > Mauro
>
>
>
> > Il sab 20 mar 2021, 19:45 Jon Awbrey <[email protected]> ha scritto:
> >
> >> Cf: Differential Propositional Calculus • Discussion 4
> >>
> >>
> http://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2021/03/20/differential-propositional-calculus-discussion-4/
> >>
> >> <QUOTE HR:>
> >>
> >> 1. I think I like very much your Cactus Graphs.  Meaning that I
> >>      am in the process of understanding them, and finding it much
> >>      better not to have to draw circles, but lines.
> >>
> >
> > So, if I want transform a circle in a line i have to use a function f:B_n
> > -> B? This is the base of temporal logic? I'm using f:N_n -> N
> >
> > Regards
> > Mauro
> >
> >
> >> 2. Less easy for me is the differential calculus.
> >>      Where is the consistency between (x,y) and (x, y, z)?
> >>      (x, y) means that x and y are not equal and (x, y, z)
> >>      means that one of them is false.
> >>      Unequality and truth/falsity for me are two concepts
> >>      so different I cannot think them together or see
> >>      a consistency between them.
> >>
> >> 3. What about (w, x, y, z)?
> >>
> >> 4. Can you give a grammar, like, what does a comma mean,
> >>      what do brackets mean, what does writing letters following
> >>      each other with an empty space but no comma mean, and so on?
> >>
> >> 5. Same with Cactus Graphs, though I think, they might be
> >>      self-explaining for me — everything is self-explaining,
> >>      depending on intellectual capacity, but mine is limited.
> >>
> >> </QUOTE>
> >>
> >> Dear Helmut,
> >>
> >> Many thanks for your detailed comments and questions.  They help me see
> >> the places where more detailed explanations are needed.  I added numbers
> >> to your points above for ease of reference and possible future reference
> >> in case I can't get to them all in one pass.
> >>
> >> Cactus Graphs
> >> =============
> >>
> >> I'm glad you found the cactus graphs to your liking.
> >> It was a critical transition for me when I passed from
> >> trees to cacti in my graphing and programming and it
> >> came about by recursively applying a trick of thought
> >> I learned from Peirce himself.  These days I call it a
> >> “Meta-Peircean Move” to apply one of Peirce's heuristics
> >> of choice or standard operating procedures to the state
> >> resulting from previous applications.  All that makes for
> >> a longer story I made a start at telling in the following
> >> series of posts.
> >>
> >> Animated Logical Graphs
> >> https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2019/05/28/animated-logical-graphs-14/
> >>
> >> [Links omitted for this email.  See the blog post linked at the top for
> >> the list.]
> >>
> >> https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2019/07/31/animated-logical-graphs-27/
> >>
> >> Well, the clock in the hall struck time for lunch some time ago,
> >> so I think I'll answer its call, break here, and continue later …
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >>
> >> Jon
> >>
>
>
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
► PEIRCE-L subscribers: Click on "Reply List" or "Reply All" to REPLY ON 
PEIRCE-L to this message. PEIRCE-L posts should go to [email protected] . 
► To UNSUBSCRIBE, send a message NOT to PEIRCE-L but to [email protected] 
with no subject, and with the sole line "UNSubscribe PEIRCE-L" in the BODY of 
the message. More at http://www.cspeirce.com/peirce-l/peirce-l.htm .
► PEIRCE-L is owned by THE PEIRCE GROUP;  moderated by Gary Richmond;  and 
co-managed by him and Ben Udell.

Reply via email to