> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2008 00:37:30 +0000
> Subject: [marinongpinoy] Contractual or permanent employment for seafarers?
> 
> 
> 
> (This article should spark debate within the industry)
> 
> 
> Contractual or permanent employment?
> 
> THE CURRENT debate on the employment status of Filipino seafarers 
> took center stage during the maritime debate held by the Shipping & 
> Travel Journal in time for the celebration of the national maritime 
> celebration led by the Maritime Industry Authority.
> Which is good for the Filipino seafarers: Contractual or Permanent 
> Employment? Such debate on the issue was held at the second floor of 
> the Luneta Seafarer's Welfare Foundation ground recently, and 
> several seafarers joined the lively discussion.  
> Those who were on the side of Permanent Employment were: Ka. Roger 
> San Andres, Domingo Garviola, Jaime Ambrosio, and Chief Mate Hernan 
> Patches. They were joined in by Eduardo Buco. They maintained that 
> there will be more benefits if the employment is permanent for all 
> seafarers.
> On the other hand, the Contractual Employment Team were:  Capt. 
> Victor Alviola, Capt. Galino, and Deo Cansino.  The team maintained 
> that there will be many complications if the seafarers are given 
> permanent employment. First, that would be violative of the law of 
> the land where contractual nature of seafarer's employment has been 
> decided upon by the Supreme Court last year.   
> The leader of the debating team, Capt. Alviola, pointed out that 
> Filipino seafarers can not be given permanent employment as most of 
> the ship owner's wanted contractual employment only.  In his 
> assessment, the Filipino seafarers don't have the power to change 
> that structure and the Philippine Government doesn't have the 
> willpower to change the status quo.
> Meanwhile, Ka. Roger, who was a former sea and land-based worker and 
> still strong at 62, stressed that under the permanent employment 
> system, there is security of tenure for Filipino seafarers unlike 
> now that everybody is treated casual. 
> He claimed that there are benefits given to the seafarers and if 
> these can be made permanent, then the seafarers will be better off.  
> He also said that seafarers are better protected and their welfare 
> benefits are assured under the permanent setup.
> In the words of C/M Patches, as he claimed he was on a permanent 
> employment with a company that has FPSO, not only was he assured of 
> security on the job, he is assured of benefits and allowances. He 
> said he need not worry how he will travel as the company pays for 
> it. He stressed that iIn the end, when something happens to me, my 
> family is assured of benefits that would be given by the company, 
> C/M Patches said.
> As for Capt. Galino, one of the contractual team, he explained that 
> he has been on contractual work for many years now and he has seen 
> no problem dealing with it. He said he can change employer anytime 
> and he has in fact served with various companies for years now.
> Entitled DEBATEng MARINO, it was organized by Leo J. Santiago of STJ 
> and supported by MARINA, CF Sharp Crew Management, LUSWELF and the 
> Ratings Association of the Philippines (RAP). In fact, most of those 
> who joined the debate were members of the RAP. 
> It must be recalled that at the last Philmancon, IMEC president Ian 
> Sherwood floated the idea that maybe we are having acute shortages 
> for marine officers due to contractual employment. He said, without 
> finality that "maybe our problems of lack of officers could be 
> solved by permanent employment." 
> Debate at the schools
> Meantime, at the Maritime Debate of Students held at the AIMS 
> Colleges, Pasay City, it was held that incorporation of management 
> level subjects in the baccalaureate courses is not possible as it 
> will mean additional costs on the part of the schools and those who 
> would be getting it.
> While CHED has been instructed by the Senate to study the issue 
> thoroughly, the students of the PMMS Las Pinas, which defended the 
> negative side, were of the opinion that MLC should be given to the 
> training centers. 
> On the other hand, debaters of the Enverga University took the 
> position that incorporating the ML subjects would further give the 
> would-be seafarers better competency to work onboard ships. They 
> argued that the schools can not be underestimated as they have human 
> resources and the capital to conduct management level subjects given 
> the mandate.
> PMMS Las Pinas emerged the better debating team as they had 
> explained their side with articulateness expected of debaters better 
> than their opponents. They received certificates and gold medals for 
> the effort. 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------
> 
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> 
> 
> 

_________________________________________________________________
NEW! Get Windows Live FREE.
http://www.get.live.com/wl/all

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


------------------------------------

Moderator tdk bertanggung jawab atas kebenaran isi dan/atau identitas asli 
pengirim berita. Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/pelaut/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/pelaut/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to