The tables presented on income per capita in 
East Asia need some adjustment.  The basic trend is
correct of course; by and large these countries have
been playing a very dramatic game of "catchup" with
the world's economic "leaders."  But several oddities
stick out in that table.
     Better than the per capita income table in the
World Development Reports are the table on per capita
income adjusted for PPP.  Unfortunately there is not
a long time series for them although what there is is
consistent with the generalization of East Asian relative
gains, but the latest (1992) numbers show Japan still 
behind the US.  Japanese face very high housing and food 
costs.  It should be kept in mind that nearly 40% of 
Japanese homes do not have indoor toilets.  In many ways 
it is still a "LDC."
     On the other hand Hong Kong was number 5 in the 
world (I guess this will not make many people on this
net very happy, but HK is a lot less laissez faire than
is commonly advertised).  From Table 30 of the 1994
World Development Report (1987 and 1992 data) the top 
countries down through Singapore, followed by some Asian
countries, are in percents of the US in PPP-adjusted 
real per capita incomes:
                 1987   1992
US               100    100
Switzerland      95.9   95.6
Germany (West)   80.7   89.1
Japan            74.9   87.2
Hong Kong        74.4   86.7
Canada           91.0   85.3
France           77.8   83.0
Denmark          79.4   80.7
Austria          72.8   79.4
Belgium          71.7   78.5
Norway           80.1   78.0
Italy            71.6   76.7
Sweden           80.5   76.2
Netherlands      70.2   76.0
Australia        76.4   75.0
UK               73.1   72.4
Singapore        55.7   72.3
----------------
South Korea      28.8   38.7
Malaysia         26.6   34.8
Thailand         17.2   25.5
Indonesia        10.5   12.8
P.R. China        6.5    9.1
India             4.6    5.2

     Obviously there are a lot of problems with these
numbers and alternative possible interpretations.
However in line with comments made by others I note that
in most (not all) of the East Asian "success stories"
(Taiwan data not available in World Dev. tables) are 
notable for fairly equal income distributions, in many
cases arising from vigorous post-WW II land reforms but
at least in Japan reflecting much more egalitarian wage
scales than is found in, say, the US.  It is also true
that in many of these countries, especially the PRC, 
income is now becoming more unequally distributed.  But
then that seems to be currently a worldwide phenomenon.
     Is there any country out there whose income has
become MORE equally distributed in the last ten years?
Barkley Rosser
James Madison University

Reply via email to