On Sun, 15 Oct 1995, bill mitchell wrote:
> well we are not necessarily discussing market socialism. i was responding to
> Louis (who has now taken to writing scripts for a play - should be a
> blockbuster i reckon, central character is well formed and pretty darn
> interesting!). he was against markets. i wanted to know what was wrong with the
> term market if we put it into a perpective that was non-capitalist. that is, if
> we eliminate the vertical relations that exist in capitalist LMs, what
> remaining objections have we to this idea - a place to shop.
My first impulse is to be against `markets' too, but I'd like to
see this all laid out, all logical-like. All the cards on the table...
Just what _are_ the pros and cons of `market socialism' -- in the
simple sense above, FI -- when Surplus Value is not a consideration??
+=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-+
| OCTOBER 16 - 22 : TV TURNOFF WEEK |
+=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-+
| Jim Jaszewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PGP Public Key available. |
| http://www.freenet.hamilton.on.ca/~ab975/Profile.html |
+=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-+
