On Mon, 16 Oct 1995 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > 1) Clearly if the Nobel is to be given for impact, > Lucas deserves it. If it is to be given for originality > that is highly questionable. If it is to be given on the > outcome of his policy recommendations, then it is even more > questionable, ...And the Nobel Peace prize has been given to Henry Kissinger -- why pay any attention to this pretentious bourgeois decadence?? I sure don't. I know it's `important' -- but for that reason it behooves us to _IGNORE_ it -- same way as I ignore the useless `Academy' Awards and (here in Canada) the Governor General's Awards... +=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-+ | OCTOBER 16 - 22 : TV TURNOFF WEEK | +=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-+ | Jim Jaszewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PGP Public Key available. | | http://www.freenet.hamilton.on.ca/~ab975/Profile.html | +=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-+