On Mon, 16 Oct 1995 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

>      1)  Clearly if the Nobel is to be given for impact,
> Lucas deserves it.  If it is to be given for originality
> that is highly questionable.  If it is to be given on the 
> outcome of his policy recommendations, then it is even more
> questionable,

        ...And the Nobel Peace prize has been given to Henry Kissinger -- why
pay any attention to this pretentious bourgeois decadence??  I sure don't. 

        I know it's `important' -- but for that reason it behooves us to
_IGNORE_ it -- same way as I ignore the useless `Academy' Awards and (here
in Canada) the Governor General's Awards... 


+=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-+
|                   OCTOBER  16 - 22 :  TV  TURNOFF  WEEK                    |
+=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-+
| Jim Jaszewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>     PGP Public Key available. |
| http://www.freenet.hamilton.on.ca/~ab975/Profile.html                      |
+=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-+

Reply via email to