Historic Circuit Court Decision Could Lead To Explosion In Third Party Activity Decision Could Change Political Landscape By November, Experts Say St. Paul, MN In a decision with enormous potential to affect the 1996 elections, as well as lead to a dramatic increase in third party activity, the U.S. Court of Appeals in the Eighth Circuit last week struck down Minnesota's ban on multi-party fusion, or cross-endorsement. "Fusion," which allows multiple political parties to endorse the same candidate on separate ballot lines, was once a staple of American politics. Friday's (1/5/96) decision reverses 100 years of electoral practice, and political analysts are beginning to analyze the impact of the court's move. Ironically, Minnesota was among the first states to outlaw fusion (in 1897), largely as an effort to undermine the worker-farmer alliance known as the Populists. "Re-legalizing fusion is absolutely necessary to the growth and success of real third parties. This decision will loosen the two-party stranglehold on our political system," said Joel Rogers, Chair of the Executive Council of the New Party, a minor progressive party active in 12 states, which brought the suit. Twin Cities Area New Party v. McKenna was first filed in 1994, when Minnesota election officials refused to allow the local New Party affiliate to nominate an incumbent Democratic state representative as their own candidate. Cross-endorsement fusion is critical to third party efforts since it allows minor parties to join in coalition with major parties behind candidates with a realistic chance of winning (see chart). "This will give American citizens more choices at the ballot box," says the New Party's Rogers, who teaches at the University of Wisconsin, "without forcing us to "waste" our votes on protest candidates. By permitting third parties to grow and function as part of the mainstream political system, it will encourage a more representative and value-based politics." Cornell University Professor Theodore Lowi, an important early theorist of the "centrist" party movement of Ross Perot, agreed that the decision could have a profound impact. "A genuine third party must attract regular Democrats and Republicans by nominating some of them to run as candidates with the third-party nomination as well as that of their own party. Being listed on two lines on the ballot is a powerful incentive for regular Democrats and Republicans to cooperate with a new party, if not to switch over," said Lowi. The Circuit Court's 3-0 decision in Twin Cities Area New Party v. McKenna applies to the seven midwestern states (MN, IA, MO, AR, NE, SD, ND) in the Eighth Circuit, but could pave the way for challenges to fusion bans across the country. Challenges are already moving through the legal system in Pennsylvania (3rd Circuit) and New Mexico (8th Circuit), and more are expected to be brought this year by the New Party and Ross Perot's Reform Party. The Supreme Court will likely be asked to rule on the issue this year, as there is now a "split" in lower federal courts, with the 7th Circuit ruling against fusion in a 1992 Wisconsin case. "This is a great victory not only for the people of Minnesota but those around the country," said New Party member Lisa Disch. This will allow us to build coalitions with other parties and bring in the thousands of voters who have been alienated by the status quo." Although many observers believe the short term impact will be to allow Ross Perot's Reform Party or Jesse Jackson's Rainbow Coalition to cross- endorse a Presidential or Congressional candidates in 1996, the real impact will be felt over time, according to New Party National Organizer Dan Cantor. "People are sick of the two major parties bickering, and they're even more tired of both parties being owned by the same big- money contributors. But until now there hasn't been a way for minor parties to get noticed by the media in national or state-level electoral politics. Now we can." The New Party has backed 123 candidates in the last two years, winning 83 elections, nearly all of them at the municipal, county and school board level. Fashioned after the "Christian Coalition," the New Party's main concerns are campaign finance reform, economic reconstruction of urban America, and public education.