Ellen Frank wrote: >I never get it when people talk about how important this >work on transaction costs is, how brilliant and insightful. And as Coase himself noted, his paper was "much cited and little used," at least in 1970 when he said that. It also begins from premises so ridiculous that only an economist could hold them. He quoted Sir Arthur Salter as saying "The normal economic system works itself." Why the insight that it doesn't "work itself" should be seen as profound is further proof of the banality of so much economics. Doug
- Re: Re: Coase, the myth; was, RE: Re: on howeconomistspub... JKSCHW
- Re: Re: Re: Coase, the myth; was, RE: Re: on howecon... Rod Hay
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Coase, the myth; was,RE: Re: on ... Carrol Cox
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Coase, the myth; was, RE: Re: on... Ellen Frank
- Re: Coase, the myth; was, RE: Re: on howeco... Doug Henwood
- Re: Coase, the myth; was, RE: Re: on howeco... Nathan Newman
- Re: Re: Coase, the myth; was, RE: Re: on... Peter Dorman
- Re: Re: Coase, the myth; was, RE: Re: on... Rod Hay
- Re: Re: Re: Coase, the myth; was,RE... Carrol Cox
- Re: Re: Coase, the myth; was, RE: Re: on... Ellen Frank
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Coase, the myth; was, RE: Re: on... Jim Devine
- Re: Coase, the myth Michael Perelman
- Re: Re: Coase, the myth Peter Dorman
- Re: Re: Re: Coase, the myth Michael Perelman
- Coase, the myth Louis Proyect