On Wed, 3 Apr 1996 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > In Shniad's interesting post on NZ we find the following: > > The ethos of the market pervaded everyday life. Even > the language was captured, dehumanizing the people > and communities it affected. It became acceptable to > talk of "shedding workers," as if they were > so much dead skin. > > COMMENT: This hardly seems a market image. It is of course biological. The point Kelsey was making was purely reportorial. She observes that the term "shedding" was used in place of more accurate ones, such as firing, discharging, laying off or, even, terminating. James Boyd White, a law professor who is oriented towards the branch of legal thinking called "Law and Literature" has done a literary reading of works by neo-classical economists or legal scholars in the "Law and Economics" branch. He observes that the language used is highly likely to lead to precisely this sort of deadening of human feelings for the misfortunes of others. See James Boyd White, The Language and Culture of Ecnomics in Justice as Translation 46 (1990). It is published by U. Chicago press. ellen Ellen J. Dannin California Western School of Law 225 Cedar Street San Diego, CA 92101 Phone: 619-525-1449 Fax: 619-696-9999
[PEN-L:3649] Re: The New Zealand experiment
Ellen Dannin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sat, 6 Apr 1996 08:44:32 -0800