I have always liked Polanyi's designation of labour (land and money) as "fictitious commodities" because they are treated as if they were commodities (bought and sold on the market) but which are not produced for the purpose of selling on the market. Mathew Forstater wrote: > 1) is labor power a commodity? > > I think so. Bought and sold in a market. > > 2) is labor power produced? > > that's a tougher one. it is reproduced for sure. but maybe even produced. > > Why do you say "not totally produced for sale" and not "_totally_ a > commodity"?? I can guess at what you might be getting at but better to just > let you explain. Paul Phillips, Economics, University of Manitoba
- Capital is wrong George Pennefather
- Re: Capital is wrong Mathew Forstater
- Re: Re: Capital is wrong Rod Hay
- Re: Re: Re: Capital is wrong Jim Devine
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Capital is wrong Stephen E Philion
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Capital is wr... Jim Devine
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Capital is wrong Mathew Forstater
- Re: Re: Capital is wrong Mathew Forstater
- Re: Re: Re: Capital is wrong phillp2
- Re: Re: Re: Capital is wrong Jim Devine
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Capital is wrong Carrol Cox
- Re: Capital is wrong Hinrich Kuhls
- Re: Capital is wrong Rod Hay
- Re: Capital is wrong Charles Brown
- Re: Re: Re: Capital is wrong Charles Brown
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Capital is wrong Jim Devine
- Re: Capital is wrong George Pennefather
- Re: Re: Capital is wrong Charles Brown
- Re: Capital is wrong W. Kiernan