> From:          [EMAIL PROTECTED]

>   (...) the NY Times every day
> (..) dealing with domestic US 
>   issues take a line that is in favor of a welfare state, a 
>   meaningful regulatory system, critical of growing 
>   inequality and corporate greed, sympathy for the plight of 
>   the working poor, concern over restrictive monetary 
>   policy, etc. 
>   But in pieces dealing with foreign 
>   countries, capitalism is celebrated, free-market reforms 
>   cheered, privatization lauded, and the welfare state and 
>   anything even vaguely socialistic sneered at. 
>   
>   Has anyone else noticed this pattern of the NYT's "social 
>   democracy at home, unfettered capitalism abroad" editorial 
>   policy?
>   
>   Peter

I find Peter's concern a fair one. Note, though, that his is about *the 
NYT* (i.e. Peter specifically refers to a particular case, which 
can be debated in its own right with a considerable accuracy).

I would even be inclined to suggest that, to a *very large degree*, the 
regulatory-capitalism-inside-BUT-free-market-capitalism-outside bias 
looks like a practice of most Northen governments...

It is risky to generalize in this way, I admit. But looking at the 
evidences, it does not seem very unrealistic. Think for example at 
the public budgets. I am out of date in these  statistics now, but I do 
remember that -beginning with the USA and some Eurpean governments- 
some years ago the ratios fiscal deficit to GDP were larger in these 
countries compared with the average of LDCs. I guess the same 
pattern still applies. However, an almost always first conditionality 
clausula for a poor country to receive a loan from "Bretton Woods" 
institutions or a package of ODA (official development assistance) 
from a Northern government, was a drastic reduction of the budget.
 Even if this trend cannot be confirmed on a *very general* basis, just
 think what would happen if poorer countries in the world would decide
 to "follow" economic practices in the "North" and decide to ensure a
 certain level of "unemployment benefit" ???

Now take the example of trade relations, protectionism, effective 
monopolies, cartels through multinational corporations, etc, etc... 
En fin, issues to explore, and to know more about. But my overall
feeling is that the NYT just reflects a pattern of Northen policy, 
*to a very large degree*.

Salud,

Alex


> 


Alex Izurieta
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Institute of Social Studies
P.O. Box 29776
2502 LT The Hague
Tel. 31-70-4260480
Fax. 31-70-4260755

Reply via email to