Jim Devine wrote: > > I didn't know I was disagreeing with Michael. Reading the above tells me > that I wasn't. I was talking about something else, the need for a world > hegemon to allow fiat money to operate on a world scale and the way in > which the system of competing capitalist nation states that prevailed until > the US became hegemon encouraged adherence to a rough-and-ready gold > standard instead of world fiat money. > I thought you were agreeing with Kindleberger, who thinks that the world needs fiat currencies to prevent stagnation, consequently, the lack of a "world hegemon" exacerbated the Great Depression. But you do not agree with Kindleberger, since such a "world hegemon" only replaces stagnation with stagflation, right? Edwin (Tom) Dickens
- Re: Re: Re: Marx and financial crises Doug Henwood
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Marx and financial cri... Jim Devine
- Re: Marx and financial crises Jim Devine
- Re: Re: Marx and financial crises Patrick Bond
- Re: Re: Re: Marx and financial crises Jim Devine
- Marx and financial crises alfredo antonio saad filho
- Re: Marx and financial crises Jim Devine
- Re: Re: Marx and financial crises Edwin Dickens
- Re: Re: Re: Marx and financial crises Michael Perelman
- Re: Re: Re: Marx and financial crises Jim Devine
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Marx and financial... Edwin Dickens
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Marx and financial... Jim Devine
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Marx and finan... Michael Perelman
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Marx and f... Jim Devine
- Re: Marx and financial crises Ted Winslow
- Deja vu all over again? Ted Winslow
- Re: Re: Marx and financial crises Doug Henwood
- Marx and financial crises Louis Proyect
- Who lost Russia? Louis Proyect
- Re: Re: Re: RE: Re: Keynesians and Post Keynesi... Doug Henwood