Jerry, you have made your point. Can't we leave it there? Gerald Levy wrote: > > Michael Perelman wrote: > > > Yes, Jerry, you are absolutely correct. Maybe Louis would be willing to > > admit that his is unsympathetic to the RM and that he reviewed it. I > > don't know. Even if he would 'fess up' to doing so, why would that > > confession help us? > > Whether you like Louis or vice versa seems irrelevant. > > Yes, Michael, you are absolutely correct -- whether I like Louis or vice > versa is irrelevant. > > What is relevant is whether it was appropriate for the journal > _Sozialismus_ to ask Louis to write a review of the RM conference even > though he had -- months beforehand! -- publicly trashed that conference. > > At issue is a basic question of journalistic standards. I.e. should > reviewers be selected who have already publicly displayed a bias and > prejudice against an event? > > Jerry -- Michael Perelman Economics Department California State University Chico, CA 95929 Tel. 916-898-5321 E-Mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
