>Brad De Long wrote: > >>So why, then, is the first Marx so weak in post-Marxian Marxism? >>Why was the world afflicted with, say, Paul Sweezy's claim that >>"One need not have a specific idea of a... beautiful musical >>composition, to recognize that the... the rock-and-roll that blares >>at us exemplify a pattern of utilization of human and material >>resources which is inimical to human welfare"? > >My god. Where did he say that? > >Doug _Monopoly Capital_, pp. 138-9. He also takes after slums and cars with big fins, where he has more of a point...
- Re: Marx and Dictatorship Ricardo Duchesne
- Marx and Malleability Charles Brown
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Marx and Malleability JKSCHW
- Marx and Malleability Sam Pawlett
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Marx and Malleability J. Barkley Rosser, Jr.
- Marx's Daughter & Son-In-Law was, Re: Marx... Carrol Cox
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Marx and Malleability Brad De Long
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Marx and Malleabil... Michael Perelman
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Marx and Malleabil... Rod Hay
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Marx and Malleabil... Doug Henwood
- Marx and Malleability Brad De Long
- Marx and Malleability Michael Keaney
- Re: Marx and Malleability Brad De Long
- Re: Re: Marx and Malleabi... Doug Henwood
- Re: Re: Marx and Malleabi... Jim Devine
- Re: oviet Arts Policy Sam Pawlett
- Re: Marx and Malleability Doug Henwood
- Consumer Society, was Re: Re:... Carrol Cox
- Re: Consumer Society, was... Michael Perelman
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Marx and Malleability JKSCHW
- Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Marx and Malleability JKSCHW