. . . From a working class perspective, the principle > underlying NAIRU -- for example -- could be more accurately called the > "non-advancing emancipation rate of coercion" (NAERC). In the absence of > such a number, it is nevertheless feasible to re-interpret the official > statistics and challenge the hegemonic discourse about the meaning of > those statistics. > Tom Walker We've done that number. It's 126.4. mbs
- Re: NIPA history and Fed follies Timework Web
- Re: Re: NIPA history and Fed follies Doug Henwood
- Re: NIPA history and Fed follies Timework Web
- Re: Re: NIPA history and Fed follies Max B. Sawicky
- Re: Re: NIPA history and Fed follies Jim Devine
- Re: Re: Re: NIPA history and Fed follies Carrol Cox
- Re: NIPA history and Fed follies Timework Web
- Re: NIPA history and Fed follies Timework Web
- Re: Re: NIPA history and Fed follies Jim Devine
- Re: NIPA history and Fed follies Timework Web
- Re: NIPA history and Fed follies Timework Web
- Re: Re: NIPA history and Fed follies Jim Devine